Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, ten players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, two players are on the 15-DAY IL, and two players are on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-17-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
* Miles Mastrobuoni
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 10 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 2 
Seiya Suzuki, OF
Patrick Wisdom, INF 

15-DAY IL: 2
* Justin Steele, P  
Jameson Taillon, P 

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 




Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

The Hill is Gone

Submitted by Rob G. on

Reports are out that Andy McPhail is adding to his Cubs minor league collection, much like I use to collect G.I. Joes. The latest acquisition looks to be left-hander Rich Hill.

One industry source said it's a "strong possibility" that Hill will wind up with the Orioles, perhaps as early as next week. The Orioles will likely give up a player to be named who could be contingent on Hill's success in Baltimore.

The O's just need to make some room on their 40-man roster for the deal to go down. This would also clear a spot on the Cubs 40-man roster for the new Jose Macias that the Cubs have been in search of lately.

Also, Bruce Levine did a guest spot on XM radio that I heard on my drive home. He said that the Paul Bako signing should go down tomorrow, mentioning $725K as the contract amount. The only other revelation from the interview was Levine saying that Felix Pie was the big hang-up in the Cubs not getting Brian Roberts last offseason.

Tags
Cubs rumors
Cubs Roster Moves
Rich Hill
Paul Bako

Comments

Submitted by Cubster on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:03 am

now that we don't have to use Juan Uribe in the Macia$$ role, my guess is Rich Aurelia is the next target. He wanted to go back to the Giants but Uribe beat him to their roster spot. Aurelia last yr in SF at age 36: 407 AB, 10 HR, .283 .332 .413. Righty pinch hitter. 82 games at 1B, 63 games at 3B me no likee, but he can back up ARam which is the one issue trading DeRosa they forgot to address.

Submitted by Cubster on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:11 am

There's been some XM radio discussion about Juan Cruz being a perfect fit for the Yankee bullpen because he's a type A free agent and most teams don't want to part with a first round draft pick for a middle reliever no matter how good. Or what about them adding Ben Sheets or just to irritate Redsox fans, maybe even signing Manny. The Yankees by signing Tex-Burnett-CC have given up their first 3 rounds so in theory it would have been a 4th rounder to sign Cruz. But no...they've reached their free agent quota. Under the rules, "if there are from 39 to 62 [Type A and B] players [during a given offseason], no team can sign more than three." http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090129&content_id=3784888&vke…

Submitted by Pat Kane on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:32 am

Wow, the big hang up in not getting Roberts was Pie? Who has turned into half of Heilman? One year sure changes things...

[ ]

Submitted by Bud on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:01 am

"Wow, the big hang up in not getting Roberts was Pie? Who has turned into half of Heilman? One year sure changes things..." I second; what a devestating loss in Pie's value in one season, though it is hard to quantify the true lost opportunity, considering additional Cubs players would have been involved in Pie+ for Roberts. Fwiw, I like Heilman. Pre-2008, I remember him being VERY strong as a Mets reliever. Here's hopin' he's successful transitioning to starter.

[ ]

Submitted by Andrew on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:03 am

I hope Heilman understands that he can compete to start but it's no sure thing. Not with Gaudin, Marshall, and maybe Samardzija also around to compete for it. Of course, if Peavy somehow arrives, they're allo going to the pen.

[ ]

Submitted by VirginiaPhil on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:27 am

Just to be clear, the Cubs didn't turn down Pie-for-Roberts. Sean Gallagher was the centerpiece of that deal. The Cubs could have gotten a lot of people for Gallagher, including Jake Peavy more recently. Gallagher and whoever else for Roberts was a good deal for the Orioles and the Cubs didn't want to just throw in Pie. I'm also not sure why Pie's value would plummet in the last twelve months. He had a decent year--for him--in Iowa. He had a good September in Chicago and he made the playoff roster. This winter he hit .300 in fifty at bats for Licey. There was that statistical blip (.362 BA) of a partial season in Iowa in 2007 that may have helped his trade value last year, but other than that he's the same guy.

[ ]

Submitted by OakLawnGuy on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:49 am

Pie's performance at Iowa last season was pretty good but not a massive improvement over the previous 2 seasons. And he did not exactly tear down walls in Triple A. My guess is that other organizations saw the lack of confidence that Lou, and eventually Hendry, had in his services, and just sat back and watched his market value tumble because of it. It might have only taken one GM to overvalue and pursue Pie to get what the Cubs felt they should get for him, and that just didn't happen. Then again maybe the advance scouts just watched him flail at left handed pitching and continue to pursue the sharp breaking sliders he couldn't reach, and figured, "This guy ain't as good as advertised."

[ ]

Submitted by Charlie on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:46 am

"I'm also not sure why Pie's value would plummet in the last twelve months." Here's my take. Pie's value plummeted when Piniella soured on him. Cubs don't value him, no one else values him. Hendry and Piniella's mistake was showing their hand (and possibly souring on him, but that was understandable).

Submitted by Old and Blue on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:58 am

Among Hendry's strengths, selling high is not at the top of the list, Bobby Hill being the one exception I can think of, and even then we pretty much knew he was toast.

Submitted by Q-Ball on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:08 am

Hendry sold high on Hee Seop as well, and the talent in the Nomar trade turned about to be almost nothing. But point taken.

[ ]

Submitted by VirginiaPhil on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:09 am

Choi hit a very Pie-like .218 as a rookie in the season before he was traded. Trading him a year earlier would have been selling high. The Marlins simply sold low on Lee, as a salary dump, I guess.

[ ]

Submitted by Old and Blue on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:01 am

I forgot about Choi, who I still thought at the time of the trade had a chance to be pretty good. One more season and he would have gotten nothing in return. Where the hell is he now?

[ ]

Submitted by VirginiaPhil on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:01 pm

"Decent return"--one half season of Harden so far. If the tear in his shoulder had been a smidge longer and he needed surgery--which he probably still does--they wouldn't have signed him for 2009 and that would have been the end of his Cub career. If that's a decent return for your top pitching prospect, I think you've found the right rookie-hating/baiting blog.

[ ]

Submitted by OakLawnGuy on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:36 pm

If they considered him their best pitching prospect at the time, you can say they got shorted. I'm not so sure they held him in that regard last season - right or wrong. They sent Jose Ceda, who appeared to many to be their best bullpen prospect, to Florida. Shortly after all the hoo-ha about that move, there was sentiment expressed that they considered Caridad better than Ceda.

[ ]

Submitted by Rob G. on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:48 pm

Shortly after all the hoo-ha about that move, there was sentiment expressed that they considered Caridad better than Ceda.

Bruce Miles had a post saying some Cubs folks passed along that Marcos Mateo had passed Ceda up (hence his addition to the 40-man)...is that what you're thinking?

Not that Caridad isn't too bad...

 

Submitted by Arizona Phil on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:05 am

I would think Rich Hill to BAL for Scott Moore and a provisional minor league PTBNL (with the PTBNL only added if Hill makes the Orioles Opening Day 25-man roster and Moore does not make the Cubs Opening Day roster) sounds plausible. Both Hill and Moore are out of options, so that's a push, and both are auto-renewal guys, so the salaries are also a wash.

It sounds like Piniella wants his 25th man to be a corner IF-OF-LHPH, and Moore would fit that profile, although he would still have to prove he can handle that role in Spring Training. If Moore fails to convince Uncle Lou that he is that guy, there should be "misfitted" players from other clubs becoming available at the end of Spring Training, as was the case with Reed Johnson last year. Maybe a Russell Branyan or Geoff Blum will become available at that time. Remember, the Opening Day 25-man roster does NOT have to be finalized before the start of Spring Training!

I think the 24th-man job will be a battle between Joey Gathright and Micah Hoffpauir, with Piniella deciding by the end of ST whether he prefers a 5th OF who can bunt and PR, or a LH power bat off the bench who can PH and give D-Lee a day off against a tough RHSP once every week or two.

If Gathright does not make the final roster cut, the Cubs can place him on Outright Assignment Waivers, and if he gets claimed, the Cubs are only on the hook for $400K (clubs pay the MLB minimum salary or prorated MLB minimum salary for players they claim off Outright Waivers, and the player's previous club is responsible for the balance), and if Gathright is not claimed off waivers, he can opt to be a free-agent immediately or defer the right until the end of the regular season. (Players who have accrued at least three years of MLB Service Time have the right to decline an Outright Assignment to the minors and become a FA). And if he were to opt to be a FA immediately, the Cubs would owe him nothing. If he were to accept the Outright Assignment and defer his right to be a FA until the end of the season (and most players signed to Major League contracts who get outrighted do this because they know they probably can't get more money on the open market), the Cubs would have to pay him $800K to play at Iowa, but at least he would be insurance in case something happens to an outfielder later in the season and he would also be available as an extra bench guy if the Cubs make the post-season.

If Hoffpauir is the one who gets cut, he can be optioned to Iowa where he can play every day and stay sharp & ready in case anything happens to D-Lee or any of the bench guys. Hoffpauir is already a Gold Glove-caliber 1B (he was voted the best defensive first-baseman by rival PCL managers in 2008), but he could use some "fail-safe" minor league reps in LF and RF, because the jury is still out on whether he can play outfield (especially RF).

Submitted by Cubster on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:16 am

Choi is back in Korea. A great example of an overvalued prospect. Fortunately Hendry got out from under by unloading him to the Marlins for DLee in a case of salary dump. I remember Mark Grace rolling his eyes because they kept trying to replace him at 1B with Choi who was never quite good enough to do that until they pushed Grace to Arizona. Finally that gave Choi the chance to play and they had to platoon him with right bat Eric Karros and subsequently sit him when Randall Simon took over the lefty part of the 1B platoon. To be fair to Choi, he did have that concussion that seemed to mess him up in 2003 and he never really recovered. He did have an early season HR spree with the Marlins in 2004 but it was short lived. I was at the game he got knocked out, ambulance coming thru the RF door and all, in the collision with Kerry Wood. It was the game vs Clemens and the Yankees that the Cubs won on a Karros HR 2-1. The Marlins did extract their revenge for the Choi deal in getting Ricky Nolasco (and maybe in Jose Ceda). I suppose one can keep playing the six degrees of separation game

[ ]

Submitted by The Real Neal on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:54 am

Let's not revise history here. Choi was pretty good until he got his concussion, then his replacement, Karros got off to a hot start and His Dustyness had an excuse to keep the pitch-taking rookie on the bench. Same thing would have happend to Votto this year, had Dusty gotten an opportunity to do so. .244 .389 .496 were was his stats when he got hurt.

[ ]

Submitted by VirginiaPhil on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:40 pm

It's a little bit of an urban (and suburban) myth that Choi's hitting troubles started with the collision on June 7th, 2003. He had a bad three weeks before the collision, 10 for 50 (.200) from 5/15 to 6/7. You point out that ".244 .389 .496 were his stats when he got hurt," but three weeks earlier they were .273 .434 .614. I'm getting this from BR's gamelog, but I remember that he had a hole in his swing inside which they started exploiting early, and that he was already in a swoon when he got injured. For convenience, I guess, folks have decided to date his decline to June 7th. Choi drew walks and hit home runs in the minors but he hit .266 in 744 ABs at Iowa prior to 2003. Not enough bat-on-ball. Just not a great prospect. I guess it's been recalled here several times that Jim Thome asked Hendry to lunch in early 2003 to discuss joining the Cubs. Hendry said, Thanks for lunch but we're going with Choi.

[ ]

Submitted by The Real Neal on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:12 pm

Yes, Choi is not a 1.000 OPS hitter. It's surprising that the all the way through the minors and for the first half of 2003, no one was able to find this whole in his swing. It's a game of adjustments. The pitchers made one to him, and Dusty burried him on the bench, so he didn't have a chance to adjust to the pitchers. The fact is that he had an unnapreciated skill set, and the teams who do appreciate his skills had other guys doing them a little better. Had Choi be born in Burbank, he'd probably still playing in MLB. The guy's got a career OPS of 106, over 1000+ PA's. If you think he can't hit major league pitching, you've probably got a lot more in common with Dusty Baker than you realize.

[ ]

Submitted by WISCGRAD on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:35 pm

I don't think he can hit major league pitching. He can definitely draw walks off of major league pitching. But he had over 300 ABs two years in a row (2004-2005) and hit .251 and .253. He also had 176 Ks in just 663 ABs. He can't hit lefties (carrer .151 BA), and he hit just .157 in games in which he didn't start, suggesting his use as a pinch hitter or replacement in a double switch did not go well. He can draw walks and does have doubles and home run pop, but I can't imagine - even if he had been born in Burback - him being a starter on any team at 1B nor being of much use on the bench as a back-up first baseman only who struggles pinch hitting.

[ ]

Submitted by WISCGRAD on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:23 pm

First, Jacobs was born in Chula Vista, not Burbank, so that throws it right out. Second, it's not like Choi wasn't given a chance. After being released by the Dodgers because they signed Nomar and had Loney in the wings, he was signed by the Red Sox and promptly hit .207 with a .708 OPS in AAA as a 27-year old. He battled knee, hamstring, and back problems. The Rays offered him a shot at being their starting first basemen in 2007 but he struggled again in spring training. He would have surely gotten a minor league deal somewhere, but he decided on his own to go to Korea to rejuvenate his career and get healthy. He did pretty well in the rest of 2007 in Korea, but got injured again in 2008 (headaches, shoulder injury, more back pain) and missed more than two months. When healthy he hit just 229/.295/.346 in the Korean MINOR LEAGUES. So I don't see this as a case of undervalued skills or racism. I see it simply as a case of a guy who cannot stay healthy or produce enough to get another shot. I think if he does well in the Korea majors in 2009 he will get a minor league contract and if he does well there he will work his way up to the majors again. But I am not holding my breath.

[ ]

Submitted by The Real Neal on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:48 pm

I think the crux of my point can be found right here: " he was signed by the Red Sox and promptly hit .207 with a .708 OPS in AAA as a 27-year old." Whereas the Royals are trading useful parts for a slightly inferior, more expensive player in Jacobs. The guy was a better than average major league batter, and has had injury problems. Take out the injuries, which we didn't know were going to be an issue in 2004, and he's a pretty valuable commodity.

[ ]

Submitted by Dr. aaron b on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:41 pm

In fairness, Dusty didn't know what the 2 numbers past the .244 were. He just wanted that Chinaman to get more aggressive and swing the bat. "I can't sit Karros dude. He's a proven vet. He saved us dude,"

Submitted by Cubster on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:42 am

You weren't pleased with the one season they got out of Slappy McPopUp? --- at least Hendry didn't compound the mistake. What did the Dodgers/Coletti do, 5/50 for mr groundout 1-3? Five years of that would have been awful.

Submitted by Arizona Phil on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:00 am

Submitted by Cubster on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 3:11am.

There's been some XM radio discussion about Juan Cruz being a perfect fit for the Yankee bullpen because he's a type A free agent and most teams don't want to part with a first round draft pick for a middle reliever no matter how good. Or what about them adding Ben Sheets or just to irritate Redsox fans, maybe even signing Manny.

The Yankees by signing Tex-Burnett-CC have given up their first 3 rounds so in theory it would have been a 4th rounder to sign Cruz. But no...they've reached their free agent quota.

Under the rules, "if there are from 39 to 62 [Type A and B] players [during a given offseason], no team can sign more than three."

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090129&c...

=================================

CUBSTER: Rob Manfred's explanation of the CBA quota rule conflicts with what I was told by a player agent this year. What I was told relates to the bold section below...

From the 2006 CBA Article XX - Section B (5):

"Clubs shall be limited to the number of Type A and Type B Players, as defined below, they may subsequently sign to contracts. The number of signings permitted shall be related to the number of players electing free-agency under this Section B. If there are 14 or less such Players, no Club may sign more than one Type A or Type B Player. If there are from 15 to 38 such Players, no Club man sign more than two Type A or Type B Players. If there are from 29 to 62 such Players, no club may sign more than three Type A or Type B players. If there are more than 62 such Players, the club quotas shall be increased accordingly. There shall ne no restrictions on the number of unranked Players that a Club may sign."

What I was told is that the under 14, 15-38, 39-62, and 63+ quota limits do not refer to the number of Type A and Type B Article XX Players who file for free-agency, but rather to the number of ALL Article XX free-agents who file. And that the quota increases by 24 (if 63-86 players file, Type A and Type B quota is four, if 87-110 players file, Type A and Type B quota is five, if 111-134 players file, the Type A and Type B quota is six, etc).

I know Rob Manfred was part of the MLB negotiating team and he obviously believes the quota rule refers to the number of Type A and Type B Article XX free-agents who file, not to the total number of ALL Article XX free-agents who file,

I suspect player agents and probably the MLBPA believe the quota rule refers to the TOTAL NUMBER of all Article XX free-agents (Type A, Type B, and unranked) who file. Because around 175 MLB players eligible to be Article XX free-agents filed for free-agency post-2008, the post-2008 Type A and Type B FA quota should be nine, not four. At least that's how agents (and probably the MLBPA) understand it.

I smell litigation...

Submitted by Dusty Baylor on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:08 am

Let's make no mistake on Pie guys. He flat out stunk with the Cubs. I agree. 260 at bats over 2 seasons though? With the vaunted Lou Pinella/Gerald Perry hitting gurus, they couldn't help him with his swing? As far as "not improving" at Iowa...it's not like he hit .250/.310/.390 there... 2006: age 21: 141 games, .283/.341/.451 2007 age 22: 87 games, .362/.410/.563 2008 age 23: 85 games: .287/.336/.466 If he could put up even .260/.320/.430, with his defensive value, he'd be a valuable player. I guess he'll get his shot this season with Baltimore. Scott Moore? Interesting...

[ ]

Submitted by Dr. aaron b on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:19 am

I think of Pie as a Neifi, with more power. I don't think there is any way that Felix gets his OBP more than 20-25 points higher than his Batting average. So it he only hits .260, then your looking at a guy who gets on base less than 30% of the time. Sure he is a plus defender. But in MLB your looking at a 5th outfielder. Especially when a guy isn't adept a stealing bases, and he only has 10-15 Homer power.

[ ]

Submitted by Dusty Baylor on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:33 am

Doc...I'd agree...if Pie can't get his swing righted in Baltimore. But somehow Pie managed to get his OBP higher in the minors, at each stop 30-50 points higher. I'd like to see him get a full season or 2 before writing him off. Now maybe he'll get that chance.

[ ]

Submitted by Dr. aaron b on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:21 pm

I'd like to see Pie develop just because I'd like to see a cub farmhand do so. I think he can be a useful part. I just never really bought into the McFail hype about him. If he had 30 Homer power. Then you could live with some of his shortcomings (similar to Soriano) But you can't have a .280 OBP guy in the lineup every day. Unless it's Damian Miller.

[ ]

Submitted by The Real Neal on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:00 pm

Dunston didn't strike out that much, he just didn't like to take pitches. Pie hasn't struck out that much in the minors - you guys are talking about him like he's Rob Deer. Keep in mind that Piniella is the guy who sent A-Rod down to the minors. He doesn't seem to understand that some players need time to adjust to the majors.

[ ]

Submitted by OakLawnGuy on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:47 pm

I didn't refer to him as a huge strikeout guy. He's a free swinger - with that comes plenty of strikeouts, along with a lack of proper pitch selection, which creates contact outs. Just like Dunston. With the power those two could generate, it also translates into a fair share of extra base hits. Dunston struck out 1,000 times in 6,000 at bats, Pie whiffed 532 times in about 2,500 minor league at bats. For that rate I think you need to produce some more walks and some power. Dunston never really was able to do that, and with about a 17-18% strikeout rate (counting in estimated walks and HBPs and sacs) for Pie in the minors, that doesn't bode well for big league performance. One thing Pie has going for him is he's so young. He is about 5 years off his prime so he has plenty of time to develop. It probably was not going to happen here. As for Lou, he's never been an easy guy on his rookies or his catchers. (Which really makes Soto's performance more impressive.) But the Cubs are in win-now mode and while he and Hendry have shown little patience with Pie, they obviously feel they have little margin for error, and little wiggle room for lack of performance. I wish they could do better than Fukudome in center, but that's the route they are choosing to take.

[ ]

Submitted by crunch on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:49 pm

neifi wishes he could swing a bat as quickly as pie...and neifi is a FAR superior contact hitter as far as putting his bat on the ball (even if it generally didn't turn out too well). there's a lot of ways to hit .260.

Submitted by Cubster on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:14 am

As always Az Phil is correct. I applaud you for being able to read this stuff without eyes glazing over and going into an immediate coma. --- Brian Cashman said the Yankees could sign up to eight if they want. “I’m not sure of the exact number, but it’s one we won’t worry about either way,” he said. I’m not clear on the exact reasons why, but it has to do with the size of the FA pool and how many ranked FAs the Yankees had. http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2009/01/30/yankees-can-sign-whoever-they-wan… --- ...so the Yankees are probably on the brink of signing Juan Cruz, Adam Dunn and The ManRam. Why not, they don't need a farm system. Might as well just shut down operations in Scranton Wilkes-Barre, Trenton and Tampa.

Submitted by navigator on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:00 pm

The only other revelation from the interview was Levine saying that Felix Pie was the big hang-up in the Cubs not getting Brian Roberts last offseason. Looks like Bruce's SECRET SOURCE is a subscription to the SPORTING NEWS. Gerry Fraley broke the news last January that the Cubs' unwillingness to part with FELIX PIE was the dealbreaker in the Roberts trade. Not only did Felix break that deal, but last July the Mariners wanted to trade us Raul Ibanez for Pie and a prospect. The Cubs said it was too high a price.... thud.

Submitted by Cubster on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:19 pm

Jon Heyman/SI reporting Jason Varitek signs a 2 yr deal with bosox. Don't see the $$ yet who cares?

Submitted by Arizona Phil on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:24 pm

Submitted by CPH2133 on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 12:58pm.

Juan Mateo's brother?

=========================

CPH2133: Marcos Mateo is Juan Mateo's cousin.

Submitted by Arizona Phil on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:43 pm

0-14 Article XX Free-Agents - one Type A and/or Type BR FA
15-38 Article XX Free-Agents - two Type A and/or Type B FA
39-62 Article XX Free-Agents - three Type A and/or Type B FA
63-86 Artcle XX Free-Agents - four Type A and/or Type B FA
87-110 Article XX Free-Agents - five Type A and/or Type B FA
111-134 Article XX Free-Agents - six Type A and/or Type B FA
135-158 Article XX Free-Agents - seven Type A and/or Type B FA
159-182 Artcle XX Free-Agents - eight Type A and/or Type B FA
183-206 Article XX Free-Agents - nine Type A and/or Type B FA

There were right around 180 players who were eligible to be Article XX MLB free-agents post-2008 who filed for free-agency, so that's why the quota on the number of Type A and/or Type B Article XX MLB free-agents each club can sign post-2008 is eight.

There were an additional 35 MLB players (including Joey Gathright and Aaron Miles) who became free-agents as the result of being non-tendered on 12/12 (bringing the total number of MLB free-agents on the market to right around 215), but the 35 12/12 non-tendered free-agents have nothing to do with determining the quota on the number of Type A and/or Type B FAs that a given club may sign.

The quota on Type A and Type B FAs is based entirely on how many players eligible to be Article XX type MLB free-agents file (that is, player has at least six years of MLB service time, player is not signed for the following season, and player files for free-agency during the Free-Agency Filing Period that follows the conclusion of the World Series).

Submitted by MikeC on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:48 pm

Nice article and interesting stats (that i never heard of) about Heilman. Even without that you know he has plus stuff that can get out major leaguers. Only the poo-poo brigade wants to think he is shit on a stick. I don't think Cubs fans know how good Heilman really is.

Submitted by spongebob on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:43 pm

don't get it...if we are getting a PTBN in this deal we might as well just have him show up to camp and see him pitch some more and see how he does....and if he doesn't make camp deal him for the proverbial PTBN. Sad that the promise of Pie and Hill were so hi and now they are worth nothing. Fundamentally we have to take a look at this and realize it is really hard for us to bring up players at important positions because of our need to win now or we just have bad talent evaluators.....our picks have been terrible over the years... and if you look at Tampa it's amazing how well they've been able to produce solid players who have helped bring players and production of stars...and are not forced to spend in the upcoming years. Boston for a team that can spend has been able to put players in a positions and/or trade for players. 1st rd/pick # 2006 Tyler Covin (13) 2005 Mark Pawelek (20) 2003 Ryan Harvey (6) 2002 Bobby Brownlie (21) 2001 Mark Prior (2) 2000 Luis Montanez (3) 1999 Ben Christiansen (26) 1998 Corey Patterson (3) 1997 Jon Garland (11) 1996 Todd Noel (17) 2005 8 Wade Townsend rhp - 2004 4 Jeff Niemann P 2003 1 Delmon Young OF 2002 2 B.J. Upton SS 2001 3 Dewon Brazelton P 2000 6 Rocco Baldelli 1999 1 Josh Hamilton OF There is something fundamentally wrong...and it needs to be dealt with otherwise in the next few years this team is going to be miserable and unbearable....

[ ]

Submitted by spongebob on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:59 pm

Well i'm not talking about right now....but just the pure ability to draft those who have MLB talent...Young, Hamilton (pretty good just got into drugs), Baldelli, Crawford, Price, Upton....come on...what do we have....Prior...Wood...

[ ]

Submitted by Dr. aaron b on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:43 pm

I do agree with Bob's assessment that Rich Hill should have just come to camp and competed for the #5 job. If he reverts back to 2005-2007 form. It won't reflect well on the people in charge. Maybe we can trade prospects to get him back, in the event of a Harden injury?

[ ]

Submitted by The Real Neal on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:53 pm

"As you can see there is still a shoulder tilt, but given how well he was pitching during this stretch and game, it didn’t throw him off mechanically." So this guy's theory is that he has control problems because of his mechanics, except when he doesn't have control problems. Brilliant. "It's not a mental, it's physical". Maybe he thinks baseball players are like a Brontosaurus, they've got one brain to control the body and another to control their mind. It's muscle memory, pure and simple. His muscle memory is not right so he doesn't throw the ball the place he thinks it's going.

Submitted by ultrapeanut on Fri, 01/30/2009 - 01:14 pm

May he move to the outfield and suddenly become a masher.

Submitted by Cubster on Sat, 01/31/2009 - 01:26 am

Sample size is the hole in VA Phil's swing - sort of like Chad and OBP, and me and being nice. ---- If anyone ever writes an instructional manual for reading TCR, this goes to page one of "how to read the comments section"

Recent comments

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    I suspect Brown will spend some time in the bullpen due to inning restrictions.  Pitched only 93 innings last year and career high is 104 innings in 2022.  I would expect them to be cautious with a young player with his injury history.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I wanted Almonte gone last week, but that was before Merryweather went down and Little got demoted. Almonte in his last 5 appearances has gone 4.1 IP with no ER or Runs. NO hits, 3 BBs and 8 SO. He did hit 96 with his 2S FB in AZ on Tues.
    I don't see Jed waiving him when we have injuries all over and guys with options that can be sent down.
    I probably won't like the move Jed makes, but he can't play the "let's hope no one wants his 1.7mil remaining deal and we can hide him in Iowa" card.
    That's why I think the current Bullpen stays as is and Wicks goes to Iowa.
    I don't like that, but that's the fix I see.
    We'll find out soon enough!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Teheran minor league deal is done, per MLB.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Based on Phil’s sound analysis it sounds like a no brainer for Almonte to be placed on waivers as today’s roster move. We shall see.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    I suspect Counsell/Hottovy will use the piggy-back extensively, with Taillon and Hendricks pitching as the "pig" (and with a very short leash) and some combo of Wicks, Brown, and Wesneski (whichever two do not start) as the "backers."  

    Keep in mind that Keegan Thompson has a minor league option available, and if Yency Almonte is not outrighted by 4/26 he cannot be sent to the minors without his consent after that date. Almonte is out of minor league options, so I am talking about him getting outrighted to the minors if he is not claimed off waivers, and if he is claimed off waivers, the Cubs save the pro-rated portion of his $1.9M salary, which helps lower the Cubs 2024 AAV.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Totally agree. The 26 man roster very rarely consists of the 13 best position players and 13 best pitchers.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Based on what Jed has done in the past, I’d say the plan is to

    -give Hendricks another few starts
    -give Taillon some runway ot get his season underway

    -Mix and match in the bullpen and see what sticks

    Jed usually doesn’t do a whole lot of waiver wire plays in-season, at least early in the season. He only reallly did that after he blew up the rosters in 21 and 22 because they needed bodies (guys like Schwindel, Fargas, etc).

    I think he’s a little handcuffed by a full 40 man in that he can’t really maneuver much with giving anyone showing ability at AAA (R Thompson/ Sanders/ Edwards etc). Brewer has the most tenuous grip there, and we will see what kind of chance he gets. Other than his spot, there isn’t a ton of 40 man wiggle room.

    I’m very curious to see what happens with Brown now that Taillon returns. Bullpen? Wicks to Iowa? 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Pro teams have to play their "big money" guys if they are healthy and not "locker room" issues.
    The Cubs wanted to deal JHey off well before they bought him out. They just didn't want to pay him to play for someone else for that long. Jed did give him 20+mil to play for LAD last yr.
    Jed might also let Kyle walk at some point this year. Similar scenario to JHey, except Jed thought Kyle was going to be good/solid in '24!!
    You'd think Smyly is in the same book as well. Same with Neris (he's a 1yr vet RP, so he's not really in this convo too much).
    That's ~35mil between those three and those three are going to get opportunities until at least late June) over younger guys even if their performance is "iffy".
    But, Jed is going to play Taillon a lot. They have to try and justify that contract and hope a veteran works out.
    So, Taillon, Imanaga, and Hendricks are locks for the rest of April and probably May.
    Assad, Brown and Wicks handle the last spots until Steele is ready.
    Now, you're question has real merit when Steele comes back. That will interesting if Brown is still good and Hendricks is still bad. But Taillon is entirely safe as long as he's healthy.

    And the bullpen moves were "money" based as well. Smyly has actually been okay. But he hasn't been clearly better than Little. Little had one bad outing. But Smyly makes 9mil. If they needed another RHRP and one of Little and Smyly had to go, it was going to Little. But that doesn't mean Smyly is one of the best 13 arms for the team. 

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Childersb3: I think there was an issue with Luke Little coming into a game with men on base. He seems to need a "clean" inning to be dominant. So he is a future closer and needs to be used in that role at AAA. Same goes for Michael Arias. He needs to come into a "clean" inning, and is a future closer and needs to be used in that role at AA. Porter Hodge is a more versatile pitcher, a better version of Keegan Thompson (multi-inning RP). But Little, Arias, and Hodge (probably in that order) are the Cubs top three RP prospects (all three are Cubs Top 15 prospects).

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    So, let’s do a little war gaming. Taillon is back for tonight’s game. He pitched two rehab games, just a few innings each, and not especially sharp. Let’s face it, he hasn’t been lights out since the Cubs gave him the big contract. In other words, as flat out bad as Hendricks has been, the chances of Taillon being the savior don’t look exactly promising.

    If Taillon is equally ineffective or perhaps even worse, what’s the next move? Winning teams can often find a way to work around a dud fifth starter - kinda. Two dud starters make things much more difficult.

    I believe the biggest reason for the recent bullpen moves was dissatisfaction with the recent blowing of big leads and the recognition that the bullpen wasn’t all it was thought to be. In other words, they are exploring alternate options and configurations. If similar juggling becomes necessary (even more so than it already is), what kind of reasonable maneuvering do we think could be explored?

Click HERE for the last 50 comments