Sabermetrics

2008 ZIPS
http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/oracle/discussion/2008_zips_projections_chicago_cubs/

Name
AVG
OBP SLG
OPS
Difference
ZIPS 300 382 517 899  -.076
JAMES          
Lee 291  361 462 823  
ZIps 292 354 531 885   +.013
James          
Ramirez 289 380 518 898  
Fukudome  282 382 460 842  
  257 359 379 738  -.104
Soriano 286 336 527 863  
  280 344 532 876 +.013
Soto 284 342 483 825  
  285 364 504 868 +.043
 DeRosa 276 349 405 754  
  285 376 481 857 +.103
Ward 263 342 413 755  
  216 319 402 721 +.034
Fontenot 268 333 412 745  
  305 395 514 909  +.164
Blanco 235 286 383 669  
  292 325 392 717 +.048
Edmonds 247 344 440 784  
  235 343 479 822 +.038
Johnson 272 341 400 741  
  303 358 420 778 +.037
 Theriot 266 324  348 672  
  307 387 359 746  +.074

http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/oracle/discussion/2009_zips_projections_chicago_cubs/

Name AVG OBP SLG OPS Difference from 2008
Soto 294 367 521 888 +.020
Lee 294 371 466 837 +.014
DeRosa 283 362 440 802 -.055
 Fontenot 268 340 418 758 -.151
Theriot 285 353 352 705 -.041
Cedeno 265 309 382 591  
Ramirez 289 362 520 882 -.016
Soriano 289 340 519 859 -.017
Fukudome 270 357 400 757 +.019
Pie 262 308 412 720  
Johnson 285 355 403 758 -.020
           
           
           

 

STARTERS

 

This is a couple of weeks old, but Chris Dial at Baseball Think Factory came out with a huge spreadsheet rating every player in the league on offense and defense with the appropriately named metric OPD (Offense Plus Defense). It does not take into account baserunning though, and be aware that players are compared to those who play the same position.  He briefly explains the methodology in that link and a further description of the defense can be found here. I didn't spend a lot of time assessing the merits of his system, but it seems solid enough. It tells me Albert Pujols and Joe Mauer were the best players in their respective leagues last year and well that certainly passes the smell test, although by no means is it the ONE stat that will settle every argument from now until the end of days.

The full Google spreadsheet can be found at this link and I've listed the Cubs team ratings and individual players below. It would have been nice to put a ranking next to each player so I didn't have to count them out, which I'm not going to do for every player, but I'll let you know that Soto was 17th in the NL and DeRosa 18th. The numbers are runs relative to average, not replacement or wins, and of course, a positive number is above average, negative is below average.The general sabermetrician's rule of thumb is that 10-12 runs is good for a win.

It looks like Michael Lewis may have his next besteller, a team of doctors take on the system by using a statistical approach to health care.

So what the hell am I talking about?

One of the many toys at Baseball Prospectus is something they call "Secret Sauce". BP has successfully cracked the code to playoff success and nailed the last 45 World Series winners. What? How have you never heard of this amazing prediction system? Because I made that last part up, but nevertheless a fun tool to look at as we await our playoff opponent.

I looked back through 2000 and BP did predict three World Series winners and six of the 16 participants in the World Series correct. You scoff, but what's your playoff prediction success rate?

The formula is simple enough and rather intuitive to what is commonly believed among baseball folks that power pitching, a good closer and good defense wins in the playoffs. In this case, BP uses FRAA (Fielding Runs Above Average), EqK9 (Equivalent Strikeout Rates per 9 innings) and WXRL (Win above Replacement Pitcher for the team's closer) and comes up with a score.

Their predictions and the 2008 rankings after the jump.

No, this isn't a bold Ryan Dempster-like statement about the Cubs 2008 chances. We're going to hop into the DeLorean we have sitting around here at the sprawling TCR headquarters and visit my all-time favorite Cubs team - the 1984 ballcub.


I'm sure I'm not the only one out there who can point to the 1984 Cubs as the reason why they're still Cubs fans today. As a young nine-year old living in the Northwest suburbs of Chicago, I had not yet quite sworn my life-debt to either Chicago team. If anything I was leaning towards the White Sox as they had just come off of a successful 1983 season and Dad G. fancied himself more a White Sox fan over the Cubs. Plus me and my brother scored like 8 White Sox helmets on a giveaway day the year before and that was kind of cool.

Then 1984 hit and the Cubs-love swept through Chicago. The mix of the "Daily Double", WGN, Harry Caray and being able to catch the end of most Cubs homes games right when I got home for school was enough to sway me to the Northsiders.

But, this piece isn't about my reasons for being a Cubs fan, rather about one man's bold prediction.
X
You may login with either your assigned username or your e-mail address.
The password field is case sensitive.
Loading