Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

39 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (one slot is open), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL and one player has been DESIGNATED FOR ASSIGNMENT (DFA)   

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, and eight players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, three players are on the 15-DAY IL, and two players is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-24-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
* Luke Little
Hector Neris 
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
* Matt Mervis
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Pete Crow-Armstrong 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 8 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 2
* Cody Bellinger, OF  
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL: 3
Kyle Hendricks, P 
* Drew Smyly, P 
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P

DFA: 1 
Garrett Cooper, 1B 
 




Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

The Color Purple

Submitted by Dr. Joseph Hecht on

Synonyms for Purple:     amaranthine, amethyst,  bluish-red, burgundy, grape, heliotrope, lavender, lilac, magenta, mauve, mulberry, orchid, periwinkle, perse, plum, pomegranate, puce, reddish-blue, violaceous, violet, wine.

I had to see it in person. For some reason the pictures of the Wrigley Marquee looked more Fuchsia than Purple when I saw Cubs mlb.com reporter, Carrie Muskat's Twitpic.  Any camera or maybe just the wrong lighting can play tricks on you and so can photoshop (tee hee, I rule too!). But in person, sitting in the McDonalds parking lot with my trusty iphone camera and my eyes, there it was...In glorious PURPLE.

Per Wikipedia...

The marquee was installed circa 1934. The sign was BLUE until the 1960s, and originally used changeable letters similar to the scoreboard to announce upcoming games. It originally read "Home of "The Cubs" but was changed to "Home of Chicago Cubs" by 1939. This was also changed during football season to reflect the Chicago Bears. In 1982, the two line announcement board was replaced with an electronic message board and a backlit advertising panel was added below

Of course, the Red Marquee just might be searching for it's Blue Roots.

Tags
Purple Wrigley Marquee

Comments

[ ]

Submitted by jacos on Mon, 11/22/2010 - 11:27 am

The article is from Phil Rogers. Should have said that first before I even bothered to click. Just from reading the heading looks like old Bourbon Breath has started celebrating the holidays a little early this year.

Submitted by navigator on Mon, 11/22/2010 - 11:47 am

I think the Ricketts should just keep the Wrigley sign lavender, in honor of them being the gayest owners in MLB.

Submitted by Mike Vail on Mon, 11/22/2010 - 11:49 pm

Have no fear: Dick Pole is available. Actually, I would like to have Orel Hersheiser as pitching coach,but it ain't gonna happen, so Mazzone?

Submitted by Arizona Phil on Mon, 11/22/2010 - 11:58 pm

Tampa Bay Rays have signed 1B Russ Canzler to a minor league contract. Canzler is the second Cub Rule 55 minor league FA to sign with a new organization (RHP Mitch Atkins signed with the Baltimore Orioles last week). The Cubs have signed two minor league FA from outside the organization so far (ex-BAL IF-OF Scott Moore and ex-COL LHP Scott Rice), and have re-signed James Adduci, Angel Guzman, Bryan Lahair, J. R. Mathes, Jonathan Mota, Mike Parisi, and Bobby Scales to 2011 minor league contracts. Adduci, Guzman, Lahair, Moore, Rice, and Scales (and presumably Mathes, although it hasn't been confirmed) got NRIs to Spring Training. Pitcher Jeff Gray, catchers Mark Johnson, Mario Mercedes and Mark Reed, 3B Scott McClain, and outfielders Jason Dubois and Brad Snyder remain free-agents.

[ ]

Submitted by Jumbo on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:12 am

Phil Based on the minor league contracts and players moving up through the system, who do you think are locks for Iowa? Are the Cubs far enough along in the farm rebuilding to not have to fill out the AAA roster with a bunch of "professional" minor leaguers?

[ ]

Submitted by Arizona Phil on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:08 am

Submitted by Jumbo on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 4:12am. Phil Based on the minor league contracts and players moving up through the system, who do you think are locks for Iowa? Are the Cubs far enough along in the farm rebuilding to not have to fill out the AAA roster with a bunch of "professional" minor leaguers? ======================================================== JUMBO: The Cubs are deep enough in their minor league system that they really don't need any minor league free-agents to fill out the Iowa roster. However, one of the functions of a club's AAA roster is to have at least one player at every position (plus several pitchers) who can, if needed, be promoted to the big leagues during the course of the season to replace an injured player or pitcher. Because the exact make-up of the Cubs 2011 MLB Opening Day roster is unknown at this time, I would say that as of right now, very much subject to change, that the 2011 Iowa Opening Day roster will probably look something like this: STARTING PITCHERS: Casey Coleman Jay Jackson, Chris Carpenter (unless he is moved to bullpen) Thomas Diamond J. R. Mathes RELIEF PITCHERS: Jeff Stevens Esmailin Caridad Brian Schlitter James Russell Justin Berg David Cales Austin Bibens-Dirkx (starting pitcher if Carpenter in bullpen) NOTE: This presumes Cubs MLB pitching staff is Dempster, Zambrano, Gorzelanny, Wells, and Silva as the starters, and Marmol, Marshall, Cashner, Grabow, Mateo, Maine, and Samardzija in the bullpen, but that will change if (as expected) Cubs sign FA starting pitcher and/or FA RH reliever CATCHERS: Welington Castillo Robinson Chirinos (C-1B-3B) Steve Clevenger (C-1B-3B) or Chris Robinson (other to AA) NOTE: This presumes Koyie Hill is Cubs back-up catcher (TBD) INFIELDERS: Matt Camp (SS-2B-3B-CF) Bryan Lahair (1B) Nate Samson (SS) or minor league FA SS Marquez Smith (3B) Tony Thomas (2B) OUTFIELDERS: James Adduci or Matt Spencer (other to AA) Tony Campana (CF) Brandon Guyer (RF-CF-LF) Ty Wright (LF) Bobby Scales could replace Mark Johnson as I-Cubs player-coach, starting the season on the Disabled List with some vague injury, and then getting reactivated for short periods whenever a position player goes on the 7-day DL. Mark Johnson (who was player-coach at Iowa in 2009-10) served as an Instructor and Game Manager at Instructs post-2010, and I suspect he will be named the new Cubs Minor League Catching Instructor (with Marty Pevey going back to being a manager), unless he is named manager at Peoria, Boise, or Mesa (this presumes Casey Kopitzke will be promoted to Daytona or Tennessee).

[ ]

Submitted by Arizona Phil on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:20 am

One thing to keep in mind about the Cubs 2011 MLB roster is that Geovany Soto had shoulder surgery post-2010, and it's possible that he will not be able to throw well enough to be a #1 catcher next season (at least at the start of the season). But Soto is also probably the Cubs best hitter, so do you just sit him on the bench and use him as a PH until he is healthy enough to handle the #1 catching job, or do you move him to a position where he can hit without having to throw much? And then even if he is healthy enough to catch 110-120 games, do you want your best hitter to sit on the bench 40-50 games, or would you rather have him in the lineup 150+ games by moving him to another position on days he's not catching? Because Soto (even if healthy) is NOT going to catch 150 games. The only other position Soto can play is 1B (he played there quite a bit at Iowa in 2007 when he had a sore shoulder), and that may be one of the reasons (cost being the other) the Cubs are looking at first-basemen like Nick Johnson and Chris Davis, so that Soto will be able to play 1B whenever necessary without being blocked by an Adam Dunn. But whether Soto plays 150+ games (at catcher and 1B) or just 110-120 games (max) at catcher (only), the Cubs back-up catcher is still going to start 40-50 games. Also, remember that Tyler Colvin didn't say he would not play 1B, just that he didn't want to move there during the season. So look for Colvin to play 1B (in addition to RF-CF-LF) in Spring Training if the Cubs don't acquire another LH 1st baseman during the off-season, with Soto also getting some reps there.

[ ]

Submitted by Jumbo on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:54 am

Thanks for both comments, Phil. I understand that arguments that Soto at 1B is less valuable than at C, but if there is no money to be spent outside the organization I would be all for a one year rental like LaRoche or an untested type like Davis. Between Soriano, Byrd, Fukudome, Colvin, and another 4th/5th outfielder type, I don't see why Colvin, Soto, and potentially one additional player couldn't hold down 1B. I'd rather do that than make a big commitment to a free agent like Dunn. With the existing roster, how would you construct the Cubs lineup? There's no great leadoff option. Fukudome could do it against RHP in the first half, but I don't think that's the way to go. What do you think of Castro leading off instead of staying in the second slot? Even if he's not a prototypical leadoff man I think he's the best choice for an everyday lineup. Not a lot of other options?

[ ]

Submitted by Arizona Phil on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:15 pm

Submitted by Jumbo on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:54am. Thanks for both comments, Phil. I understand that arguments that Soto at 1B is less valuable than at C, but if there is no money to be spent outside the organization I would be all for a one year rental like LaRoche or an untested type like Davis. Between Soriano, Byrd, Fukudome, Colvin, and another 4th/5th outfielder type, I don't see why Colvin, Soto, and potentially one additional player couldn't hold down 1B. I'd rather do that than make a big commitment to a free agent like Dunn. With the existing roster, how would you construct the Cubs lineup? There's no great leadoff option. Fukudome could do it against RHP in the first half, but I don't think that's the way to go. What do you think of Castro leading off instead of staying in the second slot? Even if he's not a prototypical leadoff man I think he's the best choice for an everyday lineup. Not a lot of other options? ======================================================= JUMBO: I'd go with... Fukudome, RF or DeWitt, 2B Castro, SS Byrd, CF Ramirez, 3B Soto, 1B-C Colvin, 1B-RF Soriano, LF DeWitt, 2B or W. Castillo, C and then Baker (3B-2B-1B), Barney (SS-2B-3B), Chirinos (C-1B-3B), Fuld (LF-CF-RF), and either Fukudome or W. Castillo on the bench. However, If it's Hendry making the call, then Koyie Hill probably is on the roster, replacing Chirinos or Castillo. If the Cubs acquire a LH 1B like Chris Davis or Nick Johnson, Colvin would probably play RF full-time and Fukudome would be the 4th OF instead of Fuld (presuming Fukudome is not traded). I would think that the Cubs would probably be willing to eat as much as 2/3 of Fukudome's $13.5M 2011 salary ($9M) if they can find a taker (and I think they probably can, as long as it isn't a team Fukudome has on his "no trade" list), and then they would use the $4.5M in 2011 payroll saved by trading Fukudome to pay for the RH set-up guy. If Fukudome is traded, I could see Marlon Byrd hitting lead-off (at least for a while). He has hit there before. Eventually Brett Jackson will probably be the lead-off hitter, and Hak-Ju Lee projects as either a lead-off hitter or #8 hitter if he reaches MLB.

[ ]

Submitted by Paul Noce on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:30 am

Dunn demanded a 4 year deal at $15 mil per from the Nats, who offered a 3 year deal last summer. Money wise, Dunn getting $12-13-14 mil per doesn't seem so crazy now, but still, he's a DH who refuses to accept he has fielding disease.

Submitted by Old and Blue on Sun, 11/28/2010 - 11:38 pm

Ok so this Bears game might actually be worth writing about.

Recent comments

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Childersb3: Miguel Cruz walked six in 1.2 IP in his last start, so I guess he is improving. Wilme Mora also walked six in one of his appearances a week or two ago, and one or two others have walked five. I don't know what would be the most I have ever seen a pitcher throw in a game out here, because the manager / pitching coach usually gets the pitcher out of the game if it gets too ridiculous. 

    As for the attendance, probably about 20 of the 25 were early arrivals for the Savannah Bananas game who came over to Field # 1 to see what was going on, and once they saw all the bases on balls (12 walks by Cubs pitchers and four by Angels pitchers) they ran away screaming. I'm used to it so it didn't bother me that much. 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Jed has added Teheran, Tyranski, Kissaki, and now Straily and Nico Zeglin today.

    Zeglin is 24 yrs old. Pitched well at Long Beach St in '23 and well in some Indy Ball.

    They also added Reilly and Viets in late ST.

    Have to search for MiLB arm depth anywhere you can and at all times!!!

  • Childersb3 (view)

    25 in Attendance!!!

    Phil, is that a backfield record?

    Also, 6 BBs for Cruz in 2 IP. What's the most walks you've seen in one EXT ST outing that you can recall?

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    He has a pulse. Apparently that’s the only requirement at this point.

  • crunch (view)

    cubs sign dan straily...for some reason.  minor league deal.

    welcome back.

    zac rosscup is down in mexico trying to make it happen...maybe they could throw him a contract, too.  junior lake is his teammate.  shore up a bunch of holes with some washups.

  • fullykräusened (view)

    The great thing about going to live sports events is you don't know if you're going to see something historic. Today I went to the Cub game, after putting the liner back in my coat and fishing my Cubs knit hat out of the closet. I needed all that- my seats are in the upper deck, left, so the east wind was in my face. Both teams failed to capitalize on good situations, but both starters did a good job to accomplish this. So, we go to the bottom of the sixth inning. The Cubs tie it up, and then Pete Crow-Armstrong comes up. We all know he would still be in AAA if not for injuries, and future Hall-of-Famer Justin Verlander absolutely carved up the young fellow up in his first two plate appearances. So this time he hits a fly ball. The wind was blowing in and had suppressed several strong fly balls- including a rocket off Altuve's bat that Canario hauled in (does anybody else remind me of Jorge Soler?) , but the ball kept carrying and carrying. 107mph, legit angle and carry. The crowd went nuts, the dugout went nuts. Maybe, just maybe, I saw the first homer from a long-term Cub.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Which was my original premise. They won the trades but lost their souls. They no longer employ the Cardinal way which had been so successful for so long.

  • crunch (view)

    STL traded away a lot of minor league talent that went on to do nothing in the arenado + goldschmidt trades.  neither guy blocked any of their minor league talent in the pipeline, too.  that's ideal places to add talent.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Natural cycle of baseball. Pitching makes adjustments in approach to counter a hot young rookie. Now it’s time for Busch and his coaches to counter those adjustments. Busch is very good and will figure it out, I think sooner than later.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    In 2020, the pandemic year and the year before they acquired Arenado, the Cardinals finished second and were a playoff team. Of the 12 batters with 100 plate appearances, 8 of them were home grown. Every member of the starting rotation (if you include Wainwright) and all but one of the significant relievers were home grown. While there have been a relative handful of very good trades interspersed which have been mentioned, player development had been their predominant pattern for decades - ever since I became an aware fan in the ‘70’s

    The Arenado deal was not a deal made out of dire need or desperation. It was a splashy, headline making deal for a perennial playoff team intended to be the one piece that brought the Cardinals from a very good team to a World Series contender. They have continued to wheel and deal and have been in a slide ever since. I stand by my supposition that that deal marked a notable turning point within the organization. They broke what had been a very successful formula for a very long time.
     

Click HERE for the last 50 comments